Interactive controls are loading. Phone and email links are available.

Skip to main content
Yes AI - AI Solutions Australia
For Australian Reporting Entities (>$100M revenue)

Claude AI for Australian Modern Slavery Statements

The Modern Slavery Statement is an annual board-signed disclosure under the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth). Seven mandatory criteria, supply-chain mapping narrative, risk assessment, due diligence actions, effectiveness assessment, training description, consultation. Claude does a large share of the drafting while the procurement, sustainability, GC, and board retain every supply-chain assertion and remediation decision.

Yes AI helps Australian Modern Slavery Statement cycles for ASX listed reporting entities, large NFPs, universities, and pre-IPO entities anticipating reporting threshold breaches.

Book a Modern Slavery Briefing (03) 9003 0111

Realistic ROI

a large share
Reduction in statement drafting time
From 200 hours to 40 to 80 hours
7 mandatory criteria
Drafted in one Claude session
Reporting entity, structure, supply chain, risks, action, effectiveness, consultation
$200 to $400 AUD
Per seat per month
Claude Enterprise (mandatory for board-signed statement)
30 to 45 days
Pre-cycle setup
Before annual statement cycle starts

Why Claude Specifically (Not Just Any AI)

Four properties of Claude make the difference between "tried it once" and "embedded into how the function works".

1M context: Act + AGD guidance + prior statements + supply-chain in one prompt

Claude Opus 4.7 holds up to 1 million tokens. Load the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), AGD guidance, prior statements (yours + sector peers), supply-chain mapping output, risk assessment output, due-diligence actions, training records, consultation evidence.

Conservative posture: refuses to claim due diligence not done

Modern Slavery Statements carry AGD-register publication, board sign-off, and reputation risk. Claude flags "this claims action that has not been evidenced". For the cycle, that posture is the feature.

Excellent at structured criterion-by-criterion writing in AGD-aligned tone

The seven mandatory criteria are well-defined. Claude is the strongest general model for the structured criterion-by-criterion writing the statement demands.

Projects: Act + AGD guidance + prior statements + supply-chain + due diligence pinned

Claude Projects holds the Act, AGD guidance, prior statements, supply-chain mapping, risk assessment, due-diligence actions, training records, consultation evidence.

The Modern Slavery Statement Cycle with Claude Embedded

Each of the seven mandatory criteria has a clear Claude role.

Reporting entity description

Criterion 1: Reporting Entity

Drafts the reporting entity description from corporate records and prior statement. CompSec verifies.

Structure + supply chain narrative

Criterion 2: Structure + Supply Chain

Drafts the structure and supply-chain narrative from corporate structure and supply-chain mapping output. Procurement verifies.

Risk assessment narrative

Criterion 3: Risks

Drafts the risk assessment narrative from the risk assessment output, sector benchmarks, geography risk profiles, prior risk narrative.

Actions narrative

Criterion 4: Actions

Drafts the actions narrative from due-diligence framework, supplier engagement records, audit results, remediation actions.

Effectiveness narrative

Criterion 5: Effectiveness

Drafts the effectiveness assessment narrative from KPI data, action outcomes, prior effectiveness narrative.

Consultation + other narrative

Criterion 6 + 7: Consultation + Other

Drafts the consultation narrative (with controlled entities) and the "other relevant" narrative. Board signs.

Eight High-Leverage Modern Slavery Use Cases

TaskTraditionalWith ClaudeNotes
Full Modern Slavery Statement (single entity)120 to 250 hours per cycle30 to 60 hours totalClaude drafts each criterion from data, prior, sector benchmarks. Procurement, sustainability, GC verify; board signs.
Joint statement (parent + controlled entities)200 to 400 hours per cycle50 to 100 hours totalClaude drafts entity-by-entity sections + joint sections. Consultation narrative drafted from real evidence. Each board signs.
Supply-chain risk narrative (per high-risk tier)20 to 40 hours per tier4 to 8 hoursClaude drafts narrative from risk assessment output, sector benchmarks, geography profiles. Procurement and sustainability verify.
Supplier engagement letter / questionnaire4 to 8 hours per supplier set60 to 90 minClaude drafts from supplier framework, sustainability strategy, prior questionnaires. Procurement finalises.
Remediation action narrative8 to 16 hours per material remediation90 min to 2 hoursClaude drafts from remediation case file, framework, prior narrative. Sustainability, GC, procurement verify.
Board paper supporting statement sign-off8 to 16 hours per cycle2 to 3 hoursClaude drafts board paper from statement, key risks, action progress, effectiveness. CompSec, GC, board sign.
Training narrative + training material refresh20 to 40 hours per cycle5 to 8 hoursClaude drafts training narrative + material from prior training, framework, sector best practice. L&D and procurement finalise.
AGD register entry + publication pack4 to 8 hours per cycle60 to 90 minClaude drafts AGD entry + accompanying pack. CompSec verifies; published per AGD timeline.

Six Modern Slavery Statement Discipline Notes

Board signs the statement, accountability preserved

The Modern Slavery Statement requires board sign-off. The board retains accountability for the assertions. Claude drafts; the board and named accountable officers (typically CEO, CFO, Chair) sign. Pin in the Project explicitly.

Cannot claim action not evidenced

Statements that claim due-diligence action not actually taken risk AGD scrutiny and reputation damage. Claude flags claims that need evidence; procurement and sustainability verify every action narrative against the evidence.

Supply-chain mapping evidence is owned by procurement

Claude drafts the supply-chain narrative from the mapping output procurement produces. The mapping itself, and its accuracy, is owned by procurement. The drafting layer reports the mapping; it does not generate the mapping.

Consultation with controlled entities documented

Criterion 6 requires consultation with controlled entities. The consultation evidence (records of consultation, sign-off from each entity) is the basis for the narrative. Claude drafts the narrative from the evidence; the consultation itself is the procurement / GC / CompSec workflow.

AGD register publication discipline preserved

Published statements are publicly available on the AGD register. The publication timeline and the AGD requirements are unchanged. Claude drafts the publication pack; CompSec or GC publishes per AGD timeline.

Remediation actions are people work

Where the statement describes remediation actions for identified concerns, the actions themselves are owned by procurement, sustainability, and where relevant GC. Claude drafts the narrative around the actions; the actions are the operational work.

How Yes AI Helps With Modern Slavery Statements

Modern Slavery Project setup

We load the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), AGD guidance, prior statements (yours + sector peers), supply-chain mapping output, risk assessment output, due-diligence framework, training records, consultation evidence, and house voice into a restricted Enterprise Project.

Modern Slavery prompt library

The 10 to 15 prompts the cycle runs: each of the seven criteria, supply-chain risk narrative, supplier engagement, remediation narrative, board paper, training narrative, AGD pack. Saved in the Project library.

Cycle working session (full day)

Full-day session with procurement lead, sustainability lead, GC, CompSec. We run real current cycle work through Claude. Outputs become 10 to 15 saved prompts.

Annual review + board brief

Annual (60 min) pre-cycle with the cycle lead. Refresh Act + AGD guidance Project, retire stale prompts, brief on new features. Annual paper to board on the AI approach.

Our 5-Step Modern Slavery Rollout

Most reporting entities complete the setup in 30 to 45 days, before the annual statement cycle starts.

Discovery with procurement + sustainability + GC + CompSec

Half-day session. Map the cycle, the supply-chain mapping process, the risk assessment, the due-diligence actions, the board sign-off chain. Agree engagement scope.

Procure Claude Enterprise + set up Modern Slavery Project

Set up Enterprise with admin audit logs. Build the restricted Project with Act, AGD guidance, prior statements, supply-chain mapping pre-loaded.

Cycle working session (full day)

Full-day session with the cycle team. Run real current cycle work through Claude. Outputs become 10 to 15 saved prompts.

Board paper + AGD register prep

Draft the board paper supporting the statement sign-off. Prep the AGD register entry and publication pack.

Annual review

60 min once a year, pre-cycle. Refresh Act / AGD guidance Project, retire stale prompts, brief on new features. Annual board update.

Related Reading

Claude for Procurement

The procurement / supplier workflow.

Claude for Sustainability

The sustainability leader workflow.

Claude for Compliance

The compliance and risk workflow.

FAQ

Is Claude appropriate for board-signed Modern Slavery Statements?

For the drafting layer, yes. The board signs the statement; the accountability is preserved. Claude drafts each of the seven criteria from the Act, AGD guidance, prior statements, your supply-chain mapping, risk assessment, due-diligence actions. The procurement, sustainability, GC, and board verify every assertion. The drafting time saving is substantial; the accountability is not delegated.

How do we handle the seven mandatory criteria?

Each criterion has a dedicated saved prompt. Criterion 1 (reporting entity), Criterion 2 (structure + supply chain), Criterion 3 (risks), Criterion 4 (actions), Criterion 5 (effectiveness), Criterion 6 (consultation), Criterion 7 (other). Claude drafts each from the relevant evidence. The owner of each criterion (CompSec, procurement, sustainability, GC) verifies the draft.

What about joint statements covering parent + controlled entities?

Joint statements are common for groups. Claude drafts the entity-by-entity sections and the joint sections. The Criterion 6 consultation narrative is drafted from real evidence of consultation with each controlled entity (meeting records, sign-offs). Each board signs the statement for its entity. The drafting time saving is amplified for groups.

How does this work with our supply-chain mapping platforms (Sedex, EcoVadis, Worldfavor, FRDM)?

Supply-chain mapping platforms are excellent for supplier data collection, risk scoring, audit history, and the structured record. Claude is the narrative layer that translates that data into Criterion 2 and Criterion 3 narrative. The platforms do the mapping; Claude does the writing. The procurement lead verifies the narrative reflects the mapping accurately.

What about remediation actions?

Where the statement describes remediation actions, the actions themselves are real operational work owned by procurement, sustainability, and where relevant GC. Claude drafts the narrative around the actions from the case file and the action records. The drafting layer reports the actions; it does not generate or substitute for the actions.

Effectiveness assessment is the hardest criterion. Can Claude help?

Yes, effectively. Effectiveness assessment is often the weakest section of Australian Modern Slavery Statements (AGD review feedback). Claude drafts the effectiveness narrative from KPI data, action outcomes, prior effectiveness narrative, and sector best practice. The sustainability lead and procurement lead verify the assessment is honest and evidence-based. Pin in the Project: "draft is a starting point; assessment must be honest and evidence-based."

Realistic ROI for a single ASX 200 reporting entity?

Typical pattern: a major reduction in statement drafting time. A 200-hour statement becomes 40 to 80 hours. For groups with multiple controlled entities, the saving is amplified. Enterprise cost: $5,000 to $15,000 per year for the cycle team. The harder-to-measure benefit is statement quality consistency year over year.

What about pre-IPO entities approaching the reporting threshold?

Pre-IPO entities that anticipate breaching the $100M consolidated revenue threshold should run a voluntary statement in the year before mandatory reporting begins. The voluntary statement gives the board, GC, and procurement experience with the cycle and identifies gaps in supply-chain mapping and due diligence. Yes AI helps set this up for several Australian pre-IPO entities preparing for first mandatory cycle.

Book a Modern Slavery Briefing

90-min working session for procurement, sustainability, GC, and CompSec. We walk through the cycle rollout playbook, address board sign-off and AGD register concerns, and propose a STANDARD or STRATEGIC engagement scope.

Book a Modern Slavery Briefing (03) 9003 0111

All discussions held in confidence. Australian-based consultants.